Is The 2022 GSS Sex Data Reliable?

Sex Statistics

While the more recent General Social Survey sex results haven’t received 1% of the attention as those of 2018 which have probably been shown to Sentinelese tribesmen at this point, in the event that this more recent data is brought up people are generally not happy about it. Everyone’s favourite statistic may have turned out to be not much more than a blip.

Fans of the 2018 data said ‘let’s wait until the next survey before drawing any conclusions’ when the 2021 one came out, but now that we’re here we’re seeing a concerted effort to poke holes in it. I’ve seen multiple times now the criticism levied that the data is worthless because half of young men ‘selected inapplicable’. I even heard someone claim they ‘threw them out’.

As we see here, it is true that half of the responses to the sexfreq question in 2022 were registered as ‘inapplicable’ (actually close to 54%, this is a weighted percentage). This is up from 30% in 2018 and 42% in 2021. The implication I guess is that a growing number of men are keeping their sexual activity undisclosed because they’re embarrassed or afraid that they’ll be put on an incel terror watchlist. I would think though that if there were a rapidly growing cohort of angry sexless men then they’d want to avoid contributing to the issue being minimized. I could even imagine some men who did have sex saying they didn’t due to how politicized this issue has become.

Sexfreq GSS inapplicable answers

Interestingly, when we look at the female data we see the same thing. 60% apparently selected inapplicable, the highest rate on record. Are they increasingly afraid to admit that they’ve had sex in the past year, or could something else be going on? Why for instance did it abruptly drop from 43/36% in 2006 to 6/5% in 2008, a third of both men and women just randomly decided they felt like answering it all of a sudden?

Instead, inapplicable denotes cases in which respondents weren’t administered the question to begin with, for instance if it wasn’t included on the ballot they were issued or if it was a question relating to marital satisfaction while the respondent was unmarried.

Samples are split into three ballots, which are then split into two forms each to allow for experiments such as testing for the effects of alternative wording. In 2022, the CDC high-risk behaviors module which contained the sex questions was present in only 3 of 6 forms. Mystery solved.

When it comes to non-responses to the survey overall, they are unlikely to be related to sexual behaviour questions as they are among the very last questions and only make up a small portion of the survey. Supplement non-response is also unlikely to be significantly related to those questions as many non-respondents stop taking the survey at the ISSP section. Factors such as low political interest, low cognitive ability, and general uncooperativeness appear to be more related to supplement and item non-response than sexual behaviour is (Smith, 1992).

Another thing which was brought up sometimes in the case of the 2021 survey is that they switched from face-to-face interviews to a web-based survey due to health concerns. The 2022 survey used a multimode design with the sample being divided into one or the other mode. If anything though if social desirability bias had a strong influence we’d expect the online surveys to yield higher sexlessness rates as men would now be more comfortable ‘admitting’ that they were sexually inactive.

The low sample size of 229 (237 for the partners question) for 18-29s is often criticized (though of course it never came into question when people were making overzealous extrapolations from the 2018 data), but while this is a valid concern, we can still be relatively sure that the sexlessness rate for young men hasn’t shot up to 40-50% or something as many predicted. Here is a graph with error bars. It may look slightly different to the famous one due to using the ‘sex partners in the past year’ question instead of frequency of sex in the past year as in 2012 it excluded people who reported no sex partners in the past year from the question. It also uses a different weight variable and the age range is 18-29 rather than 18-30.

With that aside, the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval is 23.3%, and it’s virtually the same using the sexfreq question. The unweighted percentage was 15.7%, so there’s no fear here of weighting drastically altering the results which seems to have occurred with the political views question.

How many young men didn't have sex in the past year? (GSS)

YouGov also shows no sign of a continuing sexlessness trend. As of February 2024, 20% of 18-29s report being sexually inactive down from 30% in late 2020, and the rate reporting being sexually active but not in the past week has remained at a steady 20%. Unfortunately you can’t simultaneously select an age range and a gender, but even if there were a 10% gender gap with more sexually inactive young men, men’s sexual inactivity rate would be 25%.

How many young men and women are having sex? (YouGov)

Another cope is to say that young men are increasingly resorting to visiting escorts. The GSS asks those who reported having sex with someone other than a steady partner if the respondent has paid for or was paid for sex in the past year (we can assume it was generally the former for men), and there’s no indication of this happening.

How many young men pay for prostitutes

In summary, the data is probably reasonably reliable and it’s unlikely that the young male sexlessness rate is above 25% or that there is a rapidly growing epidemic like the media wants you to believe.

References

Smith, Tom. (1992). A Methodological Analysis of the Sexual Behavior Questions on the GSS. Journal of Official Statistics. 8.

3 Comments

  1. I spent over three hours reading the internet today, and I haven’t come across any more compelling articles than yours. I think it’s more than worth it. I believe that the internet would be much more helpful than it is now if all bloggers and website proprietors produced stuff as excellent as you did.

  2. My brother suggested I might like this website He was totally right This post actually made my day You cannt imagine just how much time I had spent for this information Thanks

  3. Fwiw I think the graphs with a black background and green text aren’t very aesthetically appealing

Leave a Reply